Home
About
News
Resources
Contact

Hathaway Parker

Home
About
News
Resources
Contact
College sued for Title IX investigation against student

College sued for Title IX investigation against student

Macalester College was sued last February by a former student who accused the college of violating his right to due process and failing to provide him reasonable accommodations for his disabilities. The student, Alec Scott Jackson ’18, was being investigated by the college for an alleged case of sexual assault, and the lawsuit charged Jackson’s rights were violated during that disciplinary process. Jackson’s appeal for a restraining order against Macalester, which would have prevented them from carrying out his investigation while the suit was pending, was denied, and Jackson withdrew the lawsuit a few days later. Jackson no longer attends Macalester College.

Read the full article in The MAC Weekly

Attorney:   Law Offices Of Martin A Carlson, Ltd 

Berge v. University of Minnesota, Case No. A10-131

Berge v. University of Minnesota, Case No. A10-131

Berge and a female student went to a local bar with other students.  Unaccustomed to drinking alcohol, she fell ill, and Berge accompanied her to her apartment. She later claimed that Berge sexually assaulted her, while Berge claimed that she consented to the sexual encounter.  

The woman reported the incident to local police, but she did not file charges.  The dispute was brought before the Campus Committee on Student Behavior (CCSB).

Berge attempted to present evidence that he would lose $206,000 in scholarship awards if he were suspended, but the board chairman refused to allow the information. The CCSB suspended Berge from the university for two years.

Berge took the decision to the Provost’s Appeal Committee, which found that the CCSB had violated Berge’s due-process rights by prohibiting him “from presenting relevant testimony detailing the financial and personal effects of potential sanctions.”

Then the Provost decided to reverse the decision of the Appeal Committee, and to reinstate the decision of the CCSB.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals ordered a new campus hearing for Berg, ruling the CCSB decision was “arbitrary and capricious:”
 

John Doe v. Jane Roe

John Doe v. Jane Roe

Slander suit by plaintiff against alleged false accuser (who both remained students at the time of the complaint filing), rather than a suit against the university.    
Confidential settlement

Attorney: Eric Rosenberg  Rosenberg & Ball
Attorney:  Marshall H. Tanick    Hellmuth & Johnson

 

John Doe V. University of St Thomas

John Doe V. University of St Thomas

A University of St. Thomas student was not charged in a sexual encounter with a fellow freshman in her dorm room, but the private Catholic school, after its own investigation, suspended him for more than a year.

Now the student is suing.

Read the full article at the Star Tribune

Attorneys: McGraw Law Firm, P.A.         

1 2 3 4
Previous Next
College sued for Title IX investigation against student
Berge v. University of Minnesota, Case No. A10-131
John Doe v. Jane Roe
John Doe V. University of St Thomas
Get Help Now
Name *
You can expect a response within ten to fifteen minutes during business hours, a little longer after hours. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship and you should not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information from you. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by an attorney and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.
Case Status
Phone *

Thank you for contacting our office. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information. Requests for legal advice will not be accepted over the Internet. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by the lawyer and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.

Back to Top
Hathaway Parker LLP, 445 S Figueroa St, 31st Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90071213-529-9000info@hathawayparker.com

213-529-9000 / info@hathawayparker.com