Home
About
News
Resources
Contact

Hathaway Parker

Home
About
News
Resources
Contact
John Doe v. Bucknell University, Case No. 4:11-cv-01679-JEJ

John Doe v. Bucknell University, Case No. 4:11-cv-01679-JEJ

On Sept. 6, 2010, John Doe was put on temporary suspension for engaging in overly aggressive horse-play with Jane Doe, who arguably instigated the contact. Doe is suing the university on a whopping 18 counts, including civil conspiracy, false arrest, Title IX, negligence, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, etc. 

Attorney: Fox Rothschild, LLP,Shapiro & Becker

John Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al Case No. 4:15-cv-02072-MWB

John Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al Case No. 4:15-cv-02072-MWB

“John Doe” is suing the school for suspending him following its switch to an Title IX “investigative model” that “removed his ability to confront his accuser or call witnesses of his own.”

He’s asking a federal judge to place his suspension on hold while considering his claims that Penn State violated his due process rights in its investigation of allegations that he violated a female student at a frat party:

Read The Story at The College Fix:  Federal judge halts Penn State’s kangaroo-court ruling that threatened Syrian student with death

The Law Office of Andrew Schubin  

 

John Doe v. Penn State, Case No. 4:2015cv02108

John Doe v. Penn State, Case No. 4:2015cv02108

In a fraternity party in 2015, intoxicated Jane Roe performed sexual acts on three different fraternity brothers, including John Doe. Doe was suspended one year following a sexual assault claim filed against all three. Doe sued the university for the inadequacy of a newly piloted investigative model that levied his suspension from the university.

John Doe v. Philadelphia University

John Doe v. Philadelphia University

In 2011, John Doe and Jane Roe became romantically involved. Their relationship sustained two years, until Roe came back from a study abroad program at the end of her fall semester in 2013, when she discovered that he had been cheating on her while she was away. Most likely in retaliation, she filed a sexual assault claim against him, and within weeks, after an hour long hearing and 45 minutes of deliberation, Doe was expelled. Doe sued the university for a breach of his basic due process and civil rights. 

John Doe v. Saint Joseph's University, Case No. 2:13-cv-03937-LFR

John Doe v. Saint Joseph's University, Case No. 2:13-cv-03937-LFR

On the night of Nov. 16, 2012, John Doe and Jane Roe made arrangements to have sexual intercourse in Roe’s dorm. A sleepover at Roe’s ensued. The following day, Roe filed a sexual assault claim against Doe. Doe was suspended soon after. Doe sued the university on nine counts of breach of contract, defamation, Title IX violations, false light, and negligence.

Attorney: The Chartwell Law Offices

John Doe v. Shippensburg University

John Doe v. Shippensburg University

In 2004, Jane Roe claimed sexual assault against John Doe. Doe was summarily suspended two years after the university completed a thorough investigation. A court judge affirmed the university's decision, noting that there was no breach of contract, due process violations nor Title IX discrimination.

John Doe v. Swarthmore College, Case No. 2:14-cv-00532-SD

John Doe v. Swarthmore College, Case No. 2:14-cv-00532-SD

In April, 2011, Jane Doe and Jane Roe met up twice: they kissed on their first encounter and performed sexual activities on their second. No sexual intercourse occurred. One day after their second encounter, Roe, by her own volition, initiated sexual intercourse with Doe. 19 months later, she reported the incidences, but after a thorough two-month long investigation, the university cleared Doe. Two years after the incidences, however, in the wake of the Title IX transformation across college campuses, the university re-opened the case and summarily expelled Doe, finding him guilty of all claims. Doe sued the university on six counts of breach of contract, negligence, Title IX discrimination, and due process violations.

Attorney: Conrad O'Brien

John Doe v. Temple University

John Doe v. Temple University

After being unjustly expelled, John Doe sues the university for due process violations, breach of contract and Title IX discrimination.

John Doe v. Temple University, Case No. 12-515

John Doe v. Temple University, Case No. 12-515

In late 2010, John Doe was charged with sexual assault. He was suspended following a brief, biased investigation. Doe sued the university for breach of contract and due process violations.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Previous Next
John Doe v. Bucknell University, Case No. 4:11-cv-01679-JEJ
John Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al Case No. 4:15-cv-02072-MWB
John Doe v. Penn State, Case No. 4:2015cv02108
John Doe v. Philadelphia University
John Doe v. Saint Joseph's University, Case No. 2:13-cv-03937-LFR
John Doe v. Shippensburg University
John Doe v. Swarthmore College, Case No. 2:14-cv-00532-SD
John Doe v. Temple University
John Doe v. Temple University, Case No. 12-515
Get Help Now
Name *
You can expect a response within ten to fifteen minutes during business hours, a little longer after hours. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship and you should not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information from you. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by an attorney and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.
Case Status
Phone *

Thank you for contacting our office. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information. Requests for legal advice will not be accepted over the Internet. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by the lawyer and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.

Back to Top
Hathaway Parker LLP, 445 S Figueroa St, 31st Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90071213-529-9000info@hathawayparker.com

213-529-9000 / info@hathawayparker.com