Home
About
News
Resources
Contact

Hathaway Parker

Home
About
News
Resources
Contact
John Doe v. George Mason University, Case No. 1:15-cv-00209-TSE-MSN

John Doe v. George Mason University, Case No. 1:15-cv-00209-TSE-MSN

In late 2012, Jane Doe pressured John Doe into participating into a dominant-submissive sexual relationship. The romanced pursued until early 2014, when Doe stopped communicating with Roe and began seeing other women. Three months later, most likely in retaliation over Doe’s termination of the relationship, Roe made a sexual assault claim against Doe. All four counts were thoroughly investigated and Doe was found not guilty. Through an appeal by Roe, however, Doe was found guilty on two of the charges and Doe was thusly expelled. Doe sued the university on seven counts of equal rights, Title IX, due process, breach of contract and discrimination violations.

Attorney: Kaiser, LeGrand & Dillon PLLC

 

John Doe V. James Madison University, Jonathan R Alger, Mark J Warner    Case No. 5:15-cv-00035-MFU

John Doe V. James Madison University, Jonathan R Alger, Mark J Warner Case No. 5:15-cv-00035-MFU

A male student suspended from school through 2020 by a James Madison University appeals panel that found him guilty of having sex with a female student allegedly too drunk to give consent has filed a lawsuit against the university, claiming his due process rights were violated and that he is innocent.

The lawsuit, states the freshman male student had consensual sex with a freshman female student twice over the course of the fall 2014 semester, a connection that included friendly texts.

Their relationship ended abruptly after the female student, called Jane Roe in court documents, came to his room and found another woman on his bed. Her allegation was lodged after that.

See the article at College Insurrection   

Attorney: Gentry Locke
 

 

John Doe v. Longwood University

John Doe v. Longwood University

According to Jane Doe, she was dragged upstairs at a frat party and raped by John Doe. No witnesses nor medical examination validate this claim. The day Doe was arrested he was expelled, without a hearing and without a chance to tell his side of the story. Doe sued the university for a violation of his civil rights, breach of contract, and Title IX discrimination. Roe is being prosecuted for making a false police report.

Attorney: Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Claire G. Cardwell and James S. Ellenson

John Doe v. Washington and Lee University, Case No. 6:14-cv-00052

John Doe v. Washington and Lee University, Case No. 6:14-cv-00052

On Feb. 8, 2014, John Doe and Jane Roe consented to engage in sexual intercourse. Again, they consented to sexual intercourse in march. Eight months later, on Oct. 13, 2014, Roe reported the incident to the Title IX coordinator. Three weeks later and less than 24 hours after the hearing, Doe was expelled. Doe sued the university on six counts of breach of contract, due process, and Title IX violations.

Attorney: Nesenoff & Miltenberg

1 2 3 4
Previous Next
John Doe v. George Mason University, Case No. 1:15-cv-00209-TSE-MSN
John Doe V. James Madison University, Jonathan R Alger, Mark J Warner    Case No. 5:15-cv-00035-MFU
John Doe v. Longwood University
John Doe v. Washington and Lee University, Case No. 6:14-cv-00052
Get Help Now
Name *
You can expect a response within ten to fifteen minutes during business hours, a little longer after hours. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship and you should not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information from you. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by an attorney and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.
Case Status
Phone *

Thank you for contacting our office. Contacting our office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not impart confidential information in your email or message unless and until an attorney confirms in writing that there are no conflicts of interest and that the attorney requests additional information. Requests for legal advice will not be accepted over the Internet. No attorney-client relationship will be formed between you and Hathaway Parker LLP without a written retainer agreement that is signed by the lawyer and the client, and that defines the scope of the representation.

Back to Top
Hathaway Parker LLP, 445 S Figueroa St, 31st Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90071213-529-9000info@hathawayparker.com

213-529-9000 / info@hathawayparker.com